4/27/2012

Thy Kingdom come

One of several amazing things I heard, when I first came into a certain group of Christians a dozen years ago, was a teaching on the Lord’s Prayer that made tons of sense. I had known the prayer all my life (it’s the Our Father of Catholic and Orthodox traditions). As most people are aware, it was given to the first disciples of Christ by Jesus himself. I’m thinking I recall pretty well what I learned regarding the prayer, and it was all helpful, but mainly I’m remembering how one particular line in the prayer was interpreted, because the interpretation was new to me. It was new in that it took careful time to consider what might be going on with the line, “Thy Kingdom come, Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven.”

As we look around in life, my wise teacher said, we don’t see God’s kingdom evidenced here and now. Certainly things “on earth” don’t look as they do “in heaven.” And so we are praying for this thing we don’t yet see to be evident here with us. What we’re actually asking God, the teacher went on, is something more like, “May your Kingdom come, and may your will be done, in the future, here with us as it is with you, now, ‘in the heavens.’” I was struck by that thought, and I still am. Only today there’s a difference for me. Some of the Orthodox teaching I’ve heard and read is practically identical with my previous teacher’s interpretation of this passage, except that it’s given in the context of what’s called the sacramental life.

As I pray this Lord’s Prayer often these days, I’m understanding that the sacramental life is completely based around, encircling, if you will, the Throne of heaven. The light of Christ is actually shining from heaven into this world, onto earth, while yet doing so in a way that was particularly given by the same Lord who taught the first disciples how to pray.

So, for me, the experience has been this: I didn’t at all see the Kingdom of God here on earth. Now, in a certain sense and context, I do see it. This view, in me, is still extremely new and ignorant, but it’s real, evidential, not spooky or coming from a recent “revelation.” It’s been around a very long time. I believe very much in the “mustard seed” concept, as Christ used mustard seed when describing how the Kingdom would begin. The thing is, Christ continually said it would begin; it was near; it was “among you.”




There’s been, until now, no way for me to interpret that insistence of Christ’s, except to maybe believe he meant “May the Kingdom come among you at some point we don’t yet see.” But then, why did he say it was with those he spoke to, right then?

I’m thinking, from what I now see, Jesus meant, “You truly see the Kingdom, it is present though still only beginning to be apprehended in your beginning-to-be-sanctified mind (beginning to be redeemed, transformed mind). The reality of the Kingdom is present when you see me.”

I know. The natural response to this is “I don’t see Jesus. The disciples were with him then; I’m not. To say Jesus is with us right now is to make up something, to behave and think artificially, and that’s what goes on in the churches we see all around us.”

I still agree with you who respond this way. It makes sense to me that you do. I never knew, either, what could be behind the rather vague statements people made about Jesus while I was growing up. They spoke as if he were in the room. Yet, what was with that? How could he be here, while also seated at the right hand of the Father at the same time? Didn’t the disciples see Jesus ascend into the clouds?

Not that I even necessarily asked those questions, but my instincts were confirmed those dozen years ago when I came into the group of believers whose assumption is, forthrightly, no, Jesus isn’t here; he’s coming back again someday, but that will be a big event we haven’t yet experienced.

We are, in this view, basically cut off from Christ until his physical return. His teachings in the New Testament and the promises in the Protestant Old Testament are the only possibility we have to know him. If that is the truth, then it must be enough.

What if, however, there is a fuller understanding that has been with Christians from the beginning? I hope to write more about this possibility next time.

4/17/2012

mystery, revisited

Though I am old, there are some who, seeing me, see a child.

Thoughts about childhood remind me of those days before any of us little kids got the concept of teenagerhood. It was right around the corner, yet acres and acres away.

As a group we bunched and separated, individually confident until the next round with gravity, with marred knees and bandaids and a mommy's kiss. We didn't know the coming knowledge that was just a surge around that corner. Sometimes, though, we acted it out. Playing daddies and mommies with soft blankets' bundles and cookies in an easy-bake oven. Weddings on the sidewalk, giggles and petals, nary a kiss-the-bride.

Those who stood in doorways watching us little kids could not explain the mystery to our satisfaction in terms of reality. They could answer questions with directness and ease (the best of them did), but they knew they couldn't make us understand, that side of puberty, what they knew on their side.

If little kid-ness had a longer shelf life, those in doorways might have been audience to more than shouted theories by my neighborhood's show-offs in tennies. What if tiny scholars amongst us had had time to write dissertations, teach seminars, build paradigms? Debates on where babies come from might have commenced every spring. Some groups of thought would have been dismissed, some laughed at, some heralded as most likely true.

And then, as truly happened, things would have changed. Differently for everyone, yet the same shift, while those in doorways watching in love would see our dawning understanding, our sheepish shrugs, the same as took place the generation before.

These days I wonder about those gazing at me from doorways I don't yet comprehend. Even if they could answer my questions, they couldn't make me understand what is evident, has been for a while, from their side. I trust some of them are waiting, soft chuckles in their throats, for things to change.

4/15/2012

God is

I could say a lot. Obviously, I do, most times. Today, however, on this Pascha, as the Orthodox Christians celebrate it -- Easter, the Resurrection -- I'll just say I'm continuing in amazement.

God is. That's enough to post about. The first choice given in our day and age, is whether or not God is. What an amazing belief. If true, it matters... if God's is-ness affects me or did affect me or will affect me.

What did it mean, that God breathed life into Adam and spoke to all through prophets of old?

What does it mean, that God overshadowed a virgin woman and became man (adam) and lived among us and was put to death in the humility of silence and "awoke" in the flesh and ascended into heaven and promised to return?

What will it mean, to die and to face into an ultimate choice toward God or away from God? The very same reality might look two completely different ways, depending on the choice...if from the perspective of one choice God is light and from the perspective of the other choice God is annihilation. In this sense, sin is simply utter darkness, not-God-ness. Rather than creating sin or the ultimate results of sin, God is. God remains. Finally, I will be allowed to choose God or to choose not-God.

God is light and in Him is no darkness at all.


May grace and illumination find us today.


Featured Post

New Playroom

I've been consumed for a few years by care for my parents, so writing has fallen by the wayside. In and for my heart, this has become a ...